This template was considered for deletion on 2008 January 16. The result of the discussion was "no consensus".
Sherlock, Jr. moved to full length as according to discussion pg it is not considered a "short". SkierRMH02:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-03-17T02:40:00.000Z","author":"SkierRMH","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SkierRMH-2007-03-17T02:40:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
I've expanded it and I'm going to work on the articles/disambig within it. Thoughts? Comments? Lugnuts07:13, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-05-31T07:13:00.000Z","author":"Lugnuts","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Lugnuts-2007-05-31T07:13:00.000Z-Expanded_(2007)","replies":["c-Andrzejbanas-2007-05-31T13:01:00.000Z-Lugnuts-2007-05-31T07:13:00.000Z"]}}-->
Hmm. I really like how it's expanded, but it could get deleted due to it being an actor's template now instead of a director's like it was before (many popular actors of today, such as a Jim Carrey template were deleted). Then again, I think the Harold Lloyd template is still going, so we may be able to sneak around this. :) It needs a bit of disambig. still, as one of the films (Jailbait) seems to link to an Ed Wood movie! Andrzejbanas13:01, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-05-31T13:01:00.000Z","author":"Andrzejbanas","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Andrzejbanas-2007-05-31T13:01:00.000Z-Lugnuts-2007-05-31T07:13:00.000Z","replies":["c-Lugnuts-2007-05-31T14:48:00.000Z-Andrzejbanas-2007-05-31T13:01:00.000Z"]}}-->
Yeah, I'm working on the disambig/red links. Cheers! Lugnuts14:48, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-05-31T14:48:00.000Z","author":"Lugnuts","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Lugnuts-2007-05-31T14:48:00.000Z-Andrzejbanas-2007-05-31T13:01:00.000Z","replies":["c-Lugnuts-2007-05-31T18:17:00.000Z-Lugnuts-2007-05-31T14:48:00.000Z"]}}-->
And if worse came to the worse, it would be safer to revert it back to it's original state. Looks like Keaton directed a fair few of his films too. Lugnuts18:17, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-05-31T18:17:00.000Z","author":"Lugnuts","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Lugnuts-2007-05-31T18:17:00.000Z-Lugnuts-2007-05-31T14:48:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
I think the name of this template should be changed from "Films directed by Buster Keaton" as some of these films are not directed by Keaton. For example see The Saphead and Parlor, Bedroom and Bath. Hmm. I don't quite understand the previous discussion, is this deliberately named like this?--Dblk (talk) 20:22, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-10-19T20:22:00.000Z","author":"Dblk","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dblk-2008-10-19T20:22:00.000Z-Rename_it?","replies":["c-Dblk-2008-10-24T08:48:00.000Z-Dblk-2008-10-19T20:22:00.000Z"]}}-->
If no objections, I'm removing all the films NOT directed by Keaton.--Dblk (talk) 08:48, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-10-24T08:48:00.000Z","author":"Dblk","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dblk-2008-10-24T08:48:00.000Z-Dblk-2008-10-19T20:22:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
I object, it's most interesting to have a template with all BK works, written, strarred and anything else.