Template talk:Frauen-Bundesliga

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Women's sport: WOSO This template is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles This template is supported by the Women's football / soccer task force. Football: Germany / Season This template is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles This template is supported by the German football task force. This template is supported by the season article task force. Women This template is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles Germany This template is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles

@S.A. Julio: Followed migration instructions at Wikipedia:Changing templates#Migrating to a new template --Hmlarson (talk) 03:07, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-04-29T03:07:00.000Z","author":"Hmlarson","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hmlarson-2017-04-29T03:07:00.000Z-Migration","replies":["c-S.A._Julio-2017-04-29T03:20:00.000Z-Hmlarson-2017-04-29T03:07:00.000Z"]}}-->

@Hmlarson: That page seems outdated (the majority of edits are from 2006), and this is only a navbox, without any parameters. Why not just move the template so the revision history could be retained? S.A. Julio (talk) 03:20, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-04-29T03:20:00.000Z","author":"S.A. Julio","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-S.A._Julio-2017-04-29T03:20:00.000Z-Hmlarson-2017-04-29T03:07:00.000Z","replies":["c-Hmlarson-2017-04-29T03:22:00.000Z-S.A._Julio-2017-04-29T03:20:00.000Z"]}}-->

That would be the brute force approach described in the article which results in breaks throughout the entire topic. I know from previous experience with a template that had far less links and usage and was easy to fix. Hmlarson (talk) 03:22, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-04-29T03:22:00.000Z","author":"Hmlarson","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Hmlarson-2017-04-29T03:22:00.000Z-S.A._Julio-2017-04-29T03:20:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->